The interpretation - Go back to the questions you've asked yourself during the close reading. What answers have you found that you can explain here? As always, remember that good interpretation avoids both summary and opinion — your arguments must be original but crafted from actual evidence. This fable-like invocation makes the reader immediately conscious of distance, as well as the mystical connotations of the Orient in the context of Victorian imperialism.
By choosing a setting with such dual reverberations of reality and fantasy, Coleridge creates a landscape parallel to his view of the imagination — vast in breadth, yet potently accessible. Note how very little textual detail was necessary to come up with quite a bit of interpretation.
Keep an eye on the big picture - As tempting as it is to fill space with any interesting idea you come up with, do not put a single thought onto the page that you cannot relate directly to the proving of your topic sentence.
Remember, your paper must act as the impetus for an idea, not merely a description of your sources, however subtle that description might be. Integrating quotes - Sometimes the textual details you include will necessarily take the form of direct quotation, particularly when analyzing language.
It is always best to do so as inconspicuously as possible. The quotes should serve only to prove your ideas, not to supplant them. Rather than using big block quotations, wherever possible include only that which is specifically necessary to your point, within the framework of your own sentence. Keats describes the Grecian urn as follows: Keats begins by personifying the urn in terms of human innocence, as an "unravish'd bride" and a "foster child of silence and slow time".
Now that you've done some good analysis within your paragraphs, it's necessary to examine how they fit in to the goal of your overall paper. Avoid Chronology - When looking at your paper as a whole, it is much better for your paragraphs to relate according to a process of thought, rather than of chronology.
If it seems as though your paragraphs are divided according to the order of your source In other words, "first this happens," then "this happens," then "and finally. Ordering according to thought process - Here's where your highlighting becomes useful again.
Follow each of the ideas you developed throughout the text individually. If you highlighted in different colors, make all your pink highlights one section, your blue highlights another, and your yellow ones a third. In this manner your writing flows in an ordered progression, but according to the development of an argument, rather than recapitulation of the text.
Make your paragraphs build off of each other - It's best to try to arrange your paper in a manner that grows increasingly more specific. In subsequent paragraphs, try to refer back to what you mentioned in previous ones, and explain how your current subject extends or re-examines it in a new light.
Transitions - In order to give your paper unity and flow, it's important to always make smooth transitions between paragraphs. Consider the relationship between the two paragraphs, and use it as a way of moving from one to the other. You might address a similarity in argument, by saying " In a similar manner. Before putting pen to paper or finger to keyboard it will make your job much easier to have an idea in mind of exactly how your paper is going to be framed.
If you're writing on a pre-assigned topic, its nature will likely affect the way in which your paper is structured. If you're asked to " discuss " or " analyze " something for example, "Discuss the effects of the Enlightenment on the French Revolution , it means you need to treat a specific aspect of a broad topic. It is important, in these cases, to stick to the specific focus of the prompt: You must confine your paper solely to the specific relationship between the two.
When thinking about your structure, then, it's best to come up with the general areas you'd like to discuss this will largely be determined by the amount of space you have , and to divide your paper mentally between those. Very often you'll be asked to compare two pieces of literature, and there are several ways in which to effectively set up this sort of essay.
The first thing to remember which will be explored more extensively in the thesis section is that your paper cannot just compare the two pieces in general, exhaustively mentioning all similarities and differences with no specific argument. Once you know exactly what your argument is, your structure will be crucial to the techniques you use to make it.
The sequential method - This means discussing all of text A and then moving on to text B. It is then key, however, that your conclusion be a successful integration off he two or else you won't have a unifying argument.
The point-by-point method - This method works well if you have a number of parallel specifics to deal with in both texts, and involves discussing each one in turn, with respect to both texts at once. You could discuss Christ imagery in both texts first, for example, and move on to erotic symbols and so forth. In this case, the second text should be used as a continual reference point, but should not be analyzed in and of itself.
A way to structure this sort of paper is to break down your argument with respect to your main text into a number of points, as you normally would with a " discuss " paper. Within each paragraph, insert segments of analysis as to how your new arguments function within the paradigms established by the lens text. Vary your sentence structure - Nothing seems more unsophisticated than an uninterrupted succession of subject-verb constructions.
Take a series of sentences like the following as an example: Melville renders Moby Dick as simultaneously a manifestation of God and as a symbol of the ultimate evil. That Moby Dick is subject to a dichotomy of interpretations is evident in his depiction as both a manifestation of God and of the ultimate evil. We may intimate that Moby Dick is a juxtaposition of both the divine and the diabolical. Combine short sentences - Try reading your paper out loud. If it seems choppy it can likely be remedied by your grouping short sentences into longer, more complex ones.
He becomes obsessed with escaping his own past. It makes your writing weak. Maintain consistency in tense - Don't drift from the present to the past to the conditional from " he is " to " he was " to " he would have ".
Some things to avoid wherever possible: Starting a sentence with " there are " or " there were ". Using the phrase " this shows " as a substitute say " evident in this fact is " or " This interpretation belies the idea that ".
Using the word " quotation " when incorporating a direct quote. This makes for an awkward break from your natural thoughts, and creates an aura of self-consciousness in your writing. The first person or second person tense. Sometimes using the first person plural as in the previous example of "we may intimate" is generally acceptable, in that it conveys a universality that the " I " or " you " voices preclude.
Confusing commas and semi-colons. A semi-colon can be used to connect two short, related sentences into a longer one: Confusing " who " and " whom "; the former is a subject, the latter an object. Broad, non-specific words like " good, " " bad, " " nice, " " important, " " vivid, " and " thing ". If those are the only words you can use to express what you're saying, it's likely not subtle enough to make for a very good argument. As the very last impression your reader gets of your paper, the conclusion is your opportunity to sell your argument once and for all.
It's a place for reflection, for looking back at the relationship between the numerous ideas of your paper. Most importantly, however, it ought to be the site of your most complex analysis; that which incorporates everything that's gone before. DON'T allow the conclusion to become merely a restatement of the thesis with a couple of linking sentences beforehand.
DON'T view it as merely an ornamental way to end your paper - its role should be to justify your paper at the highest level. DO analyze how your argument has changed as your paper has progressed. If you haven't proven anything more than merely what you mentioned in your introduction, you haven't really said anything at all.
Throughout the course of a good paper new subtleties of argument ought to have manifested themselves, and the place to integrate all these subtleties into a new, more powerful statement of your thesis, is right in the conclusion. DON'T begin your conclusion with the opener " In conclusion. That makes your paper awkwardly self-conscious and contrived, rather than naturally unfolded. DO attempt some sort of unified closure, with respect to what you set up in the introduction.
If you used one of the previously mentioned clever introductions, make reference again to the quote, questions, or anecdote you incorporated. DO consider linking your argument to a more universal idea, analyzing its relevance with an eye on the new angle your argument proved. This applies not only to quotes, but to every single fact you incorporate. There are several methods for doing citations, but it's best just to choose one and remain consistent. Below are directions for doing citations in the MLA style, one of the most widely recognized formats.
The first step is to make a bibliography, inclusive of all works you've cited in your paper. Click here to see examples of proper citations according to the Chicago Manual of Style. To help you polish the term paper even further, read it out loud.
You will be amazed at the faulty grammar and awkward language that your ears can detect. This will also give you a good sense of the flow of the piece and will alert you to anything that sounds too abrupt or out of place. Good writing, like good music, has a certain rhythm. How does your paper sound? Is it interesting and varied or drawn out and monotonous? Building Your Argument Part One: Building Your Argument Part Two: In the final game of the regular season, OC needed a win to give them a chance at first place.
They would deliver both on the mound and at the plate. Frew would have another 2 hits game and would drive in 3 runs. The OC offense capitalized on 12 walks and would win the game in 7 innings. The pitching staff led the league in ERA and gave up the least amount of hits.
The Offense led the league in triples and homeruns, slugging percentage, walks, On-Base percentage and set a new team record for stolen bases with The Semi-final and Final will be played on Sunday. The first two games of the series were played in Kelowna last Friday, the away games in Chilliwack were supposed to be played on Saturday but were moved to Tuesday as weather forced a rescheduling.
He would throw 7 innings, giving up 7 hits, and gave up just 2 earned runs. Cole Parussini Senior, Vancouver, BC would come in relief for the last two innings and would struggle to keep the lead the Coyotes had going into the 9th. He would allow 4 runs in the 9th to make the score He would drive a ball deep enough to right field to allow Fischer to tag up at third and score the winning run.
Game two would see the OC defense struggle as they would commit 7 errors. Aiden Mordecai Soph, Cloverdale, BC would start on the mound, and while giving up 7 runs, only one would be an earned run due to all the errors behind him. The offenses for both teams would capitalize on walks and errors throughout the game. Todosichuk would continue his good offensive season racking up 3 hits and 2 RBI, and Jared Dulaba Senior, Port Coquitlam, BC would add to his stellar final season with 2 hits including his 6th double of the season.
He would also drive in 2 runs and come around to score 3 times. In relief on the mound, Brandon Becking Senior, Coquitlam, BC would get little help behind him and would give up 5 runs, 3 earned, in just one inning of work. With the score now in the bottom of the 7th, Fischer would score on a past ball to make the score , when the lights suddenly shut off.
The game would be suspended until Tuesday when the Coyotes travelled to Chilliwack. Dulaba would add an insurance run in the bottom of the 8th when he blasted his second homerun of the season over the center field wall.
Final score Coyotes. Thursday first official game would have the Coyotes continue their strong play both on offense and the mound. Dulaba would continue to hit the ball as he would again blast a homerun over the center field wall and would add another base hit. Obrigewitch would come up clutch as he would hit a bases clearing triple to put the game out of reach. In the final game, the Coyotes offense would capitalize on 4 Cascade errors to put up 11 runs and starting pitcher Cole Parussini would throw a stellar 5 innings giving up just one hit with two outs in the 5th.
The Coyotes would mercy the Cascades in 5 innings as the 10 run rule would come into effect. Next up is a single game against the Thompson Rivers University Wolfpack today Wednesday at elks stadium starting a 1pm.
The Coyotes will then host the University of Calgary Dinos for 4 games in their last regular season games of the year. First game will be Friday night a 6pm, then a double header on Saturday starting at 2pm and a single game on Sunday at 10am.
Okanagan College Baseball Follow Me. Double Gold Posted on August 22, by ocbaseball Leave a comment. Business Administration Hobbies other than Baseball?: How long have you been playing baseball? Marcus Stroman Favorite Music Artist? Travis Scott Favorite Movie? Communications Culture and Journalism Hobbies other than Baseball?:
Writing Help From Writinglabedge Com Writing A Paper For. Easy amp; Quick Proofreading Grammarly. com Ad Instantly Proofread Your Texts And Correct Grammar Style Now! paper writing help.
Paper, Subject - Education | Best Offer! - 8, Completed ORDERS Today for Abu Dhabi, UAE, Help from writinglabedge com writing a paper - Pay someone to do your paper - Scholarly paper writing services.
Paper, Subject - Performing Art, Premium Service! - 3, Completed ORDERS Today for City of Penrith, Australia, Write my paper please - Cheap fast custom papers - Help from writinglabedge com writing a paper. Tips for writing papers To help you polish the term paper even further, read it out loud. You will be amazed at the faulty grammar and awkward language that your ears can detect. This will also give you a good sense of the flow of the piece and will alert you to anything that sounds too abrupt or out of place. adapted from www.
Help from writinglabedge com writing a paper; Brand awareness research; Eng essay writing; Help with graduate thesis paper; Pa school essay help; Explain who she was and her major themes found in her writing. She also received an American Academy of Arts and Letters Award, the Frost Medal, a National Endowment for the Arts Award, the. Good writing is good writing. Many of the traits that make application essays great can also make a research paper, short story, or reading response shine. academic editing service, WritingLabEdge. Our highly trained editors will provide a second opinion about your work and help you perfect your paper, story, or thesis before submitting it.